Main: The two programs take different approaches on the main screen. Thankfully, it has links to all the software, so it’s pretty easy to just download, install, and restart. RipBot depends on some free software: AviSynth, FFDshow, Haali Media Splitter, and the Java run-time environment. Then when you run the application for the first time, it will tell you if you are missing any software. RipBot comes in a compressed file which you must un-compress and drop into a folder somewhere (say your desktop). It has a standard auto-installer that we’ve all used at some point in our computing lives. Installation: Of the two, Handbrake is far easier to install. Chrome has a similar plugin called BetterZoom. ProTip: If you’re using Firefox, the Thumbnail Zoom Plus add-on will allow you to mouse-over each image so that you can easily view the images full-size without leaving the article. Each major piece of functionality will be covered step-by-step and any nuance that is worth talking about will be covered. On one side will be Handbrake and on the other side will be RipBot. The way this article works should be pretty obvious. This article is meant to be a quick “compare and contrast” of the two programs. Both programs are free, but each offer something the other doesn’t. In the A/V community, there are a bunch of popular tools that can do this for you, but the two that stand out the most are Handbrake and RipBot264. And if you have a lot of videos to re-encode, then it can be a massive pain in the neck. If you’ve ever had to encode or transcode a video, then you know that it is both time consuming and difficult to get right.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |